In review: acquisition and leveraged finance in Spain

An extract from The Acquisition and Leveraged Finance Overview, 7th edition


The Spanish economic system has been through tough times considering the fact that the financial crisis started in 2007. Given that then, and prior to the damaging outcomes of the covid-19 pandemic, the Spanish financial system was selecting up tempo, with the authorities applying reforms to revive it from the 2008 crisis, which had a terrific impression in Spain in specific, strengthening the Spanish banking system.

At the beginning of the pandemic, businesses confronted a huge stage of uncertainty, and the major initial reaction was to maximise the availability of liquidity, making use of all the economic items to which they experienced obtain. Those firms for whom the added liquidity was not enough took access to other treatments forecasted below the pertinent funding agreements in certain, the request of waivers since of the breach of financial ratios or personal debt concentrations or the hold off in the approval of the fiscal accounts.

Individuals corporations in a weaker hard cash scenario have taken obtain to alternate ways of funding in specific, these presented by general public establishments. The authorities built a plan of guarantees by means of the Ministry of Economy and Digital Transformation and the Spanish Formal Credit Institute. This program has authorized the granting of more than €100 billion of financing to providers with liquidity requires.

On the other hand, the M&A activity in Spain has suffered a substantial fall in 12 months 2020. Till the conclusion of the third quarter, 1,387 M&A transactions have been shut, which implies 26 for every cent considerably less than the exact same period in the past calendar year.2

There have been numerous financial debt restructuring and refinancing transactions. The pre-crisis liquidity predicament identified the way these were being implemented. These businesses not underneath a worry condition have been able to get the guidance of their creditors, when those more influenced have taken benefit of the ‘Spanish scheme of arrangement’. We fully grasp that, once the genuine outcomes of the crisis are faced, this will be the path to be followed by the current market.

On top of the influence of covid-19, the Spanish economic climate was also struggling with other threats, specifically its domestic political instability, the possible penalties of a trade war and Brexit.

This surroundings and, in particular, the over-all very low level of fascination costs and sturdy liquidity, has translated into far more financial loan financings around recent a long time. In addition, the banking framework reforms carried out as a end result of the economical crisis have additional additional rigidness to financial institutions. In accordance to the new tendencies, time period financial loans B (TLBs), higher-produce bonds and immediate lending are starting to be a lot more and much more common, to the detriment of traditional lending structures. Mixes of money buildings which includes tranches of a distinct nature, this sort of as banking financial loans and institutional tranches, are the trend of the sector.

In Spain, lending to corporates is not an special banking action that has aided the advancement of the immediate lending industry.

Regulatory and tax matters

i General regulatory specifications

Frequently talking, no regulatory permits or authorisations are needed to act as a lender or a protection agent in acquisition finance offers in Spain, while particular regulatory authorisations and registrations might be expected to act as a credit rating entity for consumers.

ii Sanctions and anti-cash launderingSanctions

As a member of the European Union (EU) and United Nations (UN), Spain follows the sanctions imposed by the Stability Council of the UN and by the EU authorities under the Frequent Foreign and Stability Coverage.

AML regulations

Anti-money-laundering (AML) polices in Spain call for that, prior to initiating any business romance, the best valuable proprietor (UBO) of the functions included in the deal have to be plainly discovered.

For lawful entities, the UBO is described, in simplified phrases, as the organic person who finally owns or controls, directly or indirectly, more than 25 per cent of the share money or voting rights of the lawful particular person, or who by other means controls, right or indirectly, the administration of a authorized man or woman.

In the occasion that a unique lawful entity has no UBO (as outlined over), the Spanish anti-dollars laundering laws presume that the handle is exercised by the directors, and for that reason, their particular details must be disclosed. In the occasion that a director is a lawful particular person, the personal details of its reps (or directors) really should be disclosed.

These demands are of unique importance in Spain for the reason that, though notarisation of a financial loan doc is not essential by regulation, notarisation affords the loan providers product enforcement advantages as these types of, it is sector exercise to do so. In addition, as a common rule Spanish security interests have to be notarised in any scenario, it is once more market follow to do so. A notary could refuse to grant the relevant deed if there is any failure to fulfill these UBO prerequisites.

iii Tax mattersDeductibility of desire

Spanish company money tax (CIT) legislation does not give for a slim capitalisation routine, but has an curiosity-stripping routine limiting the deductibility of net fascination charges to 30 for each cent of altered running gains (around speaking, earnings ahead of desire, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA)) in a supplied fiscal year, with a €1 million floor. The excessive variance could profit from a carryover for an indefinite period of time of time. Where by a taxpayer incurs internet interest bills not exceeding this €1 million flooring, the variation between this sort of interest expense and the flooring volume will boost the relevant ‘cap room’ in the 5 subsequent several years. These guidelines have to be tested at a group amount in which the Spanish borrower belongs to a Spanish fiscal unity (matter to the ‘anti-leveraged buyout (LBO)’ principles described beneath).

The existence of a Spanish fiscal unity could have certain benefits. In standard, a leveraged holding firm may perhaps be equipped to shelter taxable income attained by its subsidiaries belonging to the Spanish fiscal unity from fascination expenditures incurred at the holding company stage. On top of that, dividends received by such a holding enterprise from its qualifying subsidiaries not belonging to the fiscal unity3 (to the extent they gain from the Spanish participation exemption regime)4 would be taken care of as extra EBITDA for uses of the desire-stripping regime.

The Spanish curiosity-stripping guidelines are commonly in line with the conclusions of Motion 4 of the Foundation Erosion and Profit Shifting initiative5 and considered to be ‘equally effective’ in comparison with the interest limitation rule supplied under the EU Anti-tax Avoidance Directive adopted by the Council of the European Union in July 2016. At this stage, no sizeable amendments to the Spanish guidelines outlined above have but been declared, but quite a few foreseeable variations that may perhaps consider place in the interest-stripping principles to mirror the Directive’s contents6 (in theory, prior to 1 January 2024) do not deviate noticeably from the latest regime (besides for the predicted derogation of the rule allowing for introducing exempt dividends to the EBITDA threshold).

On the other hand, there are sure anti-abuse procedures that might limit the availability of fascination deductions in just a fiscal unity or on a publish-acquisition merger. For occasion, an ‘anti-LBO’ rule imposes an added limitation to the deductibility of fascination accruing on personal debt incurred to make acquisitions of shares.7 Underneath this rule, exactly where the bidco car and the concentrate on company merge or form a fiscal unity in the four a long time adhering to the acquisition, the previously mentioned-outlined 30 for every cent EBITDA limitation should really be tested having into account only bidco’s standalone EBITDA and not the fiscal unity’s (or the EBITDA corresponding to the merged entity, as the scenario may possibly be). To the extent that bidco is a unique-function motor vehicle established up for applications of doing the shares acquisition (and not an running entity), this rule would, in practice, stop that acquisition interest was tax deductible.

To dispel allegations that the anti-LBO rule set personal fairness corporations at a disadvantage as regards industrial groups, the Spanish lawmaker launched an ‘escape clause’ to the anti-LBO rule, whereby the extra 30 for each cent limitation would not use if: (1) the degree of leverage does not exceed 70 for each cent of the buy selling price of the shares acquired and (2) this kind of acquisition personal debt is diminished on a proportionate foundation within just the 8 yrs subsequent the acquisition, until the financial debt reaches a threshold of 30 for every cent of the buy value.8 In which the acquisition is financed by means of various kinds of bank loan services (e.g., junior, senior, mezzanine, vendor financial loans or other types of loans), the amortisation expected underneath the anti-LBO rule may be performed in any of such services, presented that the merged superb principal total of all of them does not exceed the optimum threshold for the calendar year in dilemma.9 On the other hand, the indebtedness existing at the concentrate on business prior to its acquisition does not surface to drop less than the scope of this rule.10

In addition, there are other anti-abuse guidelines below Spanish tax law that might limit the deductibility of curiosity incurred by a Spanish borrower. Interest bills arising in connection with intragroup personal debt, wherever that credit card debt is applied to obtain shareholdings from other team entities or to execute fairness contributions into other team entities are non-deductible, except if the borrower is in a position to proof to the Spanish tax authorities that there are sound enterprise explanations for the transactions.11 On top of that, desire accruing on revenue-collaborating financial loans (PPLs) granted by group entities, and curiosity accruing on hybrid devices if the fascination is not taxed or taxed at a level lessen than 10 for each cent at the degree of the grantor, are also non-deductible. Spanish transfer-pricing guidelines may perhaps also be used by the Spanish tax authorities to problem fascination deductibility in a connected-bash financial loan and to reclassify debt instruments into fairness instruments.

Withholding taxGeneral regulations

From a realistic standpoint, it is conventional for foreign loan companies to use EU-dependent vehicles to make loans to Spanish debtors, as it is not market place exercise for borrowers to gross-up desire withholding tax (WHT) levied on payments made to lenders who are not ‘qualifying lenders’ (i.e., creditors entitled to an fascination withholding exemption). As a typical rule, payments of Spanish-sourced interest are now topic to WHT at a 19 for every cent price. Tax haven-centered creditors will be issue to this typical WHT level. EU-centered loan companies (or EU long term institutions of EU-centered lenders)12 may possibly receive interest absolutely free from Spanish WHT, matter to the fulfilment of compliance specifications (e.g., keeping a valid government-issued tax home certification). Spanish-resident registered banks and registered Spanish everlasting institutions of overseas financial institutions also reward from the WHT desire exemption. Finally, selected tax treaties entered into by Spain may possibly also present for a WHT exemption on curiosity (e.g., the tax treaties entered into with Switzerland, the United States and the United kingdom (which really should place the United kingdom creditors in a comparable posture to EU lenders upon Brexit)), also subject to the fulfilment of compliance and precise eligibility prerequisites.


Spanish tax law does not deliver for a definition of ‘beneficial owner’ in regard of desire. In truth, the earlier mentioned-stated rule exempting interest payments produced to EU creditors from WHT does not provide for a ‘beneficial ownership’ provision. Notwithstanding this, the Spanish domestic rule derives from the transposition of Directive 2003/49/EC (the Desire Directive) and the Courtroom of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The CJEU has analysed in the ‘Danish cases’ (C-115/16, C-118/16, C-119/16 and C-299/16) the concept of ‘beneficial owner’ beneath the Curiosity Directive, and concluded that the idea of beneficial proprietor (to be interpreted in a way consistent with the OECD standards) may well be applicable by Member States no matter of the inclusion of a advantageous ownership necessity in the domestic rules. Recently, the Spanish Financial-administrative Courtroom (Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central or TEAC), in a resolution dated 8 October 2019, echoed the Danish scenarios and concluded that the Spanish curiosity WHT exemption can only be claimed by the advantageous operator of the curiosity. There is nevertheless uncertainty as regards to how the administrative interpretation of this doctrine will evolve and how it may well influence the lending sector, but back again-to-back again lending structures, shareholder loan financings, and sub-participation preparations need to be meticulously reviewed in light of these kinds of precedents and of anti-abuse principles usually. An evaluation of the robustness of a lending structure from these types of potential worries ought to be carried out on a scenario-by-situation basis.

Distinctive routine for notes choices

Spanish tax legislation supplies for a unique tax routine13 relevant to, inter alia, qualifying notes choices made by Spanish resident organizations and by wholly owned subsidiaries of Spanish corporations resident inside of the EU,14 provided that specific more prerequisites relating to the supplying (e.g., the listing of the notes on a suitable exchange) are satisfied, and selected compliance info is timely supplied by the paying agent concerned. This routine presents for a WHT interest exemption on payments produced to all international noteholders, irrespective of their jurisdiction of residence (i.e., tax-haven investors are not penalised) and without having requiring individualised tax documentation (such as authorities-issued tax-home certificates) to be equipped.

Horizontal tax groups

As from fiscal a long time starting off from 1 January 2015, the Spanish Company Earnings Tax Act (the CIT Act) has enlarged the scope of the tax consolidation regime, and authorized that Spanish subsidiaries of a frequent non-Spanish resident parent organization15 form a horizontal tax team that would contain all Spanish-resident immediate or oblique subsidiaries in regard of which such final non-Spanish guardian firm had a shareholding meeting the requirements described over (i.e., generally, 75 for every cent of share funds, and bulk of the subsidiary’s voting legal rights). The wording of the regulation (and in specific, the policies governing the development of horizontal tax groups) results in numerous pitfalls that may well affect a vast array of industries (e.g., multinational groups with Spanish investments, non-public equity sponsors, and monetary establishments funding Spanish acquisitions).

For occasion, under the horizontal team guidelines, a multinational group’s parent firm holding oblique investments in distinctive enterprises with out any marriage whatsoever among the them from an organisation standpoint (which is a quite frequent circumstance in multinational conglomerates) could be deemed to be the mum or dad enterprise of a sole fiscal unity that need to be routinely formed by all the Spanish entities it owns. Under the Spanish CIT Act provisions (which have already been interpreted by the Spanish tax authorities),16 if these oblique Spanish subsidiaries previously fashioned their individual tax teams in Spain, a person of the pre-existing tax teams ought to stop to exist, with the degrouping fees that could derive from these kinds of a termination (i.e., recapture of specific intragroup gains that were removed in the previous owing to the applicability of the consolidated tax regime). Spanish law does, however, not determine which tax team really should be terminated.17

An additional illustration of unwarranted implications of the horizontal team guidelines could be followed in non-public fairness structures. Normally, personal equity sponsors have ‘master’ keeping companies in an EU jurisdiction and make leveraged buyout acquisitions through Spanish bidco autos partly financed by loans granted by monetary institutions. At the time the Spanish bidco acquires the shares of the Spanish ‘target’ organization, bidco and target usually type a tax consolidated team. In such structures, the next Spanish expense produced indirectly from the exact learn holding business (with the same bidco–target composition) may perhaps switch out not to be suitable to sort a standalone tax consolidated group. The reality that there is a frequent father or mother firm for both the initial bidco and the next bidco would mean that the entities associated to the 2nd acquisition (i.e., the next bidco and the second focus on team) ought to kind a single horizontal tax team.

This kind of an unwarranted outcome might be a good inconvenience for the non-public fairness sponsor (as the economic models prepared for the first acquisition – organized taking into account the characteristics of the first target and the initial bidco’s leverage degree – might be drastically modified)18 and for the fiscal institutions (as the development of a horizontal tax group may perhaps imply an further publicity to tax pitfalls involved with companies that did not drop less than the perimeter of the acquisition that was financed).19

Though there could be strategies to structure investments to steer clear of the adverse implications of these routine,20 their implementation necessitates individualised tax suggestions.

This post is produced offered by Latham & Watkins for educational reasons only as nicely as to give you typical information and facts and a normal comprehension of the law, not to supply precise legal tips. Your receipt of this interaction on your own makes no lawyer customer relationship concerning you and Latham & Watkins. Any articles of this post must not be used as a substitute for knowledgeable legal assistance from a licensed professional legal professional in your jurisdiction.